🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.